This blog post should be reported to the U.S. Government immediately!
Here's my response to this whitehouse blog post:
Dear Big Brother,
I'm going around and saying all kinds of scary things about Obama's health care plan such as:
- Where in the constitution does it authorize the federal government to force people to buy health insurance?
- Most cost estimates the government has given on a new programs have been grossly inaccurate, so the chances that 1 trillion dollars will be all it costs is highly unlikely.
- Forcing young people to purchase health insurance will be done simply to make it possible for the insurance companies to cover the costs of being forced by the government to insure people with pre-existing conditions, and never mind if this is a moral thing to do to those young people who may otherwise choose not to buy health insurance."
Scary words, aren't they? No one should be able to say that! We must protect people from such words. People cannot think for themselves. They must be protected from the opinions of people who are not in the government.
So to you Mr whitehouse blogger, why don't you just go and have me arrested? That's what you really want anyway, isn't it?
The truly scary things are the words coming out of your mouth.
Signed:
One who despises people who employ agents that point guns at people that harmed no one and force them to do things they don't want to do and force them to not do harmless things that they want to do.
P.S.
I believe that Internet will be credited with being the catalyst that enabled the masses to realize that organizing society around the initiation of the use of force is immoral and should be abolished. So, Mr whitehouse blogger, if you really want to cram forced health care down our throats you should start censoring the Internet like the chinese dictators. I, of course, do realize that flag@whitehouse.gov is just the u.s. government's first steps down that slippery slope. You need to start very gradually, by spreading fear with regards to the Internet. Once you get enough fear generated, then you'll step in and "regulate" to "protect" us from it, i.e., censor it.
I abhor violence of any kind except self defense and I will *not* initiate violence against anyone including any government. I will not resist government oppression as I am not a violent person. Let it be perfectly clear that I intend to obey the laws of the U.S. government even though many of those laws are harmful, oppressive, destructive and immoral. Yes, I despise Mr whitehouse blogger, but I absolutely will never, ever do anything to harm him in any way. I will, however, exercise my "right" to free speech, and will refuse to be intimidated by the true intent of this whitehouse blog post which is to chill free speech.
1 comment:
Well, unfortunately, people still mired in statist mentality would probably dismiss your post above as a yet another radicalist ramble even though much of what you say is true.
They aren't in the mentality that would allow them to see clearly what this force you are talking about actually is, especially given that this WhiteHouse blog post focuses exactly on the supposed ability to *choose* to stick with your current insurance.
I'm pointing this out because knowing it can help communicate what we have to say better, in a way that wont just brand us as worthy of dismissal.
That said, the WhiteHouse blog post conveniently omits saying that even if people are able to stick with their current insurance they will be forced to pay, via taxes, for this extra insurance. You rightfully call that being forced to buy government healthcare. That point alone is enough to discredit government healthcare.
Finally, while government is certainly in its continued growth inclined to spy and censor like a Big Brother, flagging certain content sources on a web site doesn't quite qualify since this is something everyone can do on their own blogs and sites. You can "flag" certain government content sources yourself as "untrustworthy" for instance. It's your right.
The only exception to this would be if government people then went and actually tried to prevent dissenting opinion from being communicated. This is probably coming, but flagging by itself ain't it yet.
Cheers
Post a Comment