Compiling Cases where concealed handgun permit holders have stopped mass public shootings and other mass attacks

Yeah, fuck you google you evil fucks trying to manipulate the elections. You and your leftist political agenda. Fuck you all.

Link to article

Contemtible Judges and Courts

A person or group of people who behave in a respectable manner will spontaneously garner respect. To demand respect under force of law, as in the courts, is contemptible, rendering the person or group unworthy of respect.

Refusing to stand up as a judge enters the court is punishable by law resulting in whatever punishment they hand out (fines, jail time...).

Not standing in this manner is a form of protest, protected by the First Amendment. Apparently, your Constitutionally protected rights must be left at the door of the court.

"The dispassionate objectivity of scientists is a myth."

Full article

"The dispassionate objectivity of scientists is a myth. No scientist is simply involved in the single-minded pursuit of truth, he is also engaged in the passionate pursuit of research grants and professional success. Nutritionists may wish to attack malnutrition, but they also wish to earn their living in ways they find congenial. Although many people are killed by malnutrition each year, an increasing number of us are kept alive by it."

J. P. W. RIVERS, Department of Human Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Slippery Slopes in Action

Decisions By Consensus

Consensus Decision-Making

(From ACT UP : Civil Disobedience Training Manual)

What is consensus? 

Consensus is a process for group decision-making. It is a method by which an entire group of people can come to an agreement. The input and ideas of all participants are gathered and synthesized to arrive at a final decision acceptable to all. Through consensus, we are not only working to achieve better solutions, but also to promote the growth of community and trust.

Consensus vs. voting 

Voting is a means by which we choose one alternative from several. Consensus, on the other hand, is a process of synthesizing many diverse elements together. Voting is a win or lose model, in which people are more often concerned with the numbers it takes to “win” than with the issue itself. Voting does not take into account individual feelings or needs. In essence, it is a quantitative, rather than qualitative, method of decision-making. With consensus people can and should work through differences and reach a mutually satisfactory position. It is possible for one person’s insights or strongly held beliefs to sway the whole group. No ideas are lost, each member’s input is valued as part of the solution. A group committed to consensus may utilize other forms of decision-making (individual, compromise, majority rule) when appropriate; however, a group that has adopted a consensus model will use that process for any item that brings up a lot of emotions, is something that concerns people’s ethics, politics, morals or other areas where there is much investment.

What does consensus mean? Consensus does not mean that everyone thinks that the decision made is necessarily the best one possible, or even that they are sure it will work. What it does mean is that in coming to that decision, no one felt that her/his position on the matter was misunderstood or that it wasn’t given a proper hearing. Hopefully, everyone will think it is the best decision; this often happens because, when it works, collective intelligence does come up with better solutions than could individuals. Consensus takes more time and member skills, but uses lots of resources before a decision is made, creates commitment to the decision and often facilitates creative decision. It gives everyone some experience with new processes of interaction and conflict resolution, which is basic but important skillbuilding. For consensus to be a positive experience, it is best if the group has (1) common values, (2) some skill in group process and conflict resolution, or a commitment to let these be facilitated, (3) commitment and responsibility to the group by its members and (4) sufficient time for everyone to participate in the process. Forming the consensus proposals During discussion a proposal for resolution is put forward. It is amended and modified through more discussion, or withdrawn if it seems to be a dead end. During this discussion period it is important to articulate differences clearly. It is the responsibility of those who are having trouble with a proposal to put forth alternative suggestions. The fundamental right of consensus is for all people to be able to express themselves in their own words and of their own will. The fundamental responsibility of consensus is to assure others of their right to speak and be heard. Coercion and tradeoffs are replaced with creative alternatives, and compromise with synthesis.

When a proposal seems to be well understood by everyone, and there are no new changes asked for, the facilitator(s) can ask if there are any objections or reservations to it. If there are no objections, there can be a call for consensus. If there are still no objections, then after a moment of silence you have your decision. Once consensus does appear to have been reached, it really helps to have someone repeat the decision to the group so everyone is clear on what has been decided. Difficulties in reaching consensus If a decision has been reached, or is on the verge of being reached that you cannot support, there are several ways to express your objections: Non-support (“I don’t see the need for this, but I’ll go along.”) Reservations (“I think this may be a mistake but I can live with it.”) Standing aside (“I personally can’t do this, but I won’t stop others from doing it.”) Blocking (“I cannot support this or allow the group to support this. It is immoral.” If a decision violates someone’s fundamental moral values he/she is obligated to block consensus.) Withdrawing from the group. Obviously, if many people express non-support or reservations or stand aside or leave the group, it may not be a viable decision even if no one directly blocks it. This is what is known as a “lukewarm” consensus and it is just as desirable as a lukewarm bath. If consensus is blocked and no new consensus can be reached, the group stays with whatever the previous decision was on the subject, or does nothing if that is applicable. Major philosophical or moral questions that will come up with each affinity group will have to be worked through as soon as the group forms. Roles in a consensus meeting There are several roles which, if filled, can help consensus decision-making run smoothly. The facilitator(s) aids the group in defining decisions that need to be made, helps them through the stages of reaching an agreement, keeps the meeting moving, focuses discussion to the point at hand; makes sure everyone has the opportunity to participate, and formulates and tests to see if consensus has been reached. Facilitators help to direct the process of the meeting, not its content. They never make decisions for the group. If a facilitator feels too emotionally involved in an issue or discussion and cannot remain neutral in behavior, if not in attitude, then s/he should ask someone to take over the task of facilitation for that agenda item. A vibes-watcher is someone besides the facilitator who watches and comments on individual and group feelings and patterns of participation. Vibes-watchers need to be specially tuned in to the group dynamics. A recorder can take notes on the meeting, especially of decisions made and means of implementation and a time-keeper keeps things going on schedule so that each agenda item can be covered in the time allotted for it. (If discussion runs over the time for an item, the group may or may not decide to contract for more time to finish up.) Even though individuals take on these roles, all participants in a meeting should be aware of and involved in the issues, process, and feelings of the group, and should share their individual expertise in helping the group run smoothly and reach a decision. This is especially true when it comes to finding compromise agreements to seemingly contradictory positions.

there's more in link above...

Hamed Abdel-Samad Predicted Cologne Rapes and Censored and Called Racist

Interview of Hamed Abdel-Samad

Starts at 30:15 "How is this mass immigration to Germany of Middle Eastern migrants going to go in your opinion?"

"I am pessimistic..." "I am not against immigration of Muslims..."

He predicted sexual attacks before Cologne "not all of them are refugees, and some of them will be engaged in criminal acts very soon, and some of them will make mass sexual harassment, because I know this phenomena from Egypt and from other. I was called racist because I said so. This same opinion was cut from the interview and was reintroduced again to the German public as the opinion of an expert once the mass harassment took place in Cologne on New Year's Eve."

"So you are a racist if you will warn for a problem before it happens ,but you are an expert when you are analyzing this problem after it happens. This is how the public opinion is made, and it will be a tough thing to do, we will have a lot of social tension, those young people will not be integrated into the social system very soon, they will not have jobs. Some of them will, sure, but the majority of them will be a burden on themselves and on the German society, we will notice the increase of the phenomena of Islamic radicalization, the phenomena of sexual harassment, and the phenomena of organized crime, and Germany should have thought about that before opening the heart."

"I understand the moral urge behind this, but before you open your borders to everyone you should have asked yourself do you have the capacity to do so and who are those people who are entering the country."

How Some Migrants Import Idiologies That Destroyed Their Own Countries

Interview of Hamed Abdel-Samad

Responding to a question about a survey where 13% of Arab youth said they would want to live in the United States:

"Don't be surprised if many of those who want to live in the Unites States, in the next survey, they will approve the implementation of Sharia in the United States. That's the schizophrenia of the education, because people are not really trained or educated to appreciate freedom and to live freely, so, in the pyramid of their needs, they want to have security, they want to have welfare, and once they have this they think to roll back to religious values, to even implementation of Sharia, missionary work to convert people to Islam, so they don't really know why they are leaving their own country. The same thing with many refugees who are now escaping from civil wars, closed also by religion and religious intolerance or sectarianism, but once they arrive in Germany or any other country, they start to fight with each other, Sunni and Shia, Yazidis and Muslims, Druze and others, they start to fight against each other, and they start to implement the same religious rules which just destroyed their own countries.

So they are not aware yet that they were escaping from this mentality that destroyed their own country, and that they try to implement the same rules that were responsible that their country were destroyed that they had to leave their country. And that's a question of education.

After a school massacre, the U.K. banned handguns in 1998. A decade later, handgun crime had doubled.

Articlehttp://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323777204578195470446855466

Is There Such Thing as "Extremist" or "Radical" Islam?

Somalia Better Off Without Government? (yes)

Scholarly article

Paris Attack 2015 - ISIS Says It Is All About Islam

They say it very clearly in their statement of responsibility. The motivation of the attack is because French people have uttered words and dared to draw some pictures they find distasteful. Because they are not Muslims. Because Islamic scriptures tell them to kill non-Muslims. Because ISIS wants the entire world to be Muslim (or be forced to pay a special tax to not get killed).

If I lived in Bangladesh (and many other countries), I would be killed for posting this.

Link

Islamic State
France

Urgent: Statement about the Blessed Paris Invasion on the French Crusaders

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

The Almighty said: “And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).” [Al-Hashr: 2]

In a blessed attack for which Allah facilitated the causes for success, a faithful group of the soldiers of the Caliphate, may Allah dignify it and make it victorious, launched out, targeting the capital of prostitution and obscenity, the carrier of the banner of the Cross in Europe, Paris… Youths who divorced the world and went to their enemy seeking to be killed in the cause of Allah, in support of His religion and His Prophet, Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, and his charges, and to put the nose of His enemies in the ground. So they were honest with Allah, we consider them thusly, and Allah conquered through their hands and cast in the hearts of the Crusaders horror in the middle of their land, where eight brothers wrapped in explosive belts and armed with machine rifles, targeted sites that were accurately chosen in the heart of the capital of France, including the Stade de France during the match between the Crusader German and French teams, where the fool of France, Francois Hollande, was present.

[They also targeted] the Bataclan Conference Center, where hundreds of apostates had gathered in a profligate prostitution party, and other areas in the 10th and 11th and 18th [arrondissements] and in a coordinated fashion. So Paris shook under their feet, and its streets were tight upon them, and the result of the attacks was the death of no less than 100 Crusaders and the wounding of more than those, and unto Allah is all praise and gratitude.

Allah had granted our brothers their wish and gave them what they loved, for they detonated their belts in the gatherings of the disbelievers after running out of ammunition, we ask Allah to accept them among the martyrs and make us follow them.

Let France and those who walk in its path know that they will remain on the top of the list of targets of the Islamic State, and that the smell of death will never leave their noses as long as they lead the convoy of the Crusader campaign, and dare to curse our Prophet, Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, and are proud of fighting Islam in France and striking the Muslims in the land of the Caliphate with their planes, which did not help them at all in the streets of Paris and its rotten alleys. This attack is the first of the storm and a warning to those who wish to learn.

Allah is Great

“But honor, power and glory belong to Allah, and to His Messenger (Muhammad), and to the believers, but the hypocrites know not.” [From Al-Munafiqun: 8]

Peaceful Man Arrested for Defending Himself. Stun Gun is a "Firearm", Self Defense is "Vigilantism"

Article

A taser is considered a "firearm" and defending yourself against violent attackers is considered "vigilantism".

From the article:

He had bought the stun gun, which was billed as a 'self defence torch', from a Dutch trucker after his friend was robbed by migrants whilst driving through Calais. 

The court heard the devices are legal in both Holland and France, where they are available freely at petrol stations and are frequently carried by lorry drivers. 

However it is classed as a firearm in the UK, meaning Mr Garrett was arrested on the spot when it was found in his vehicle. 

...

Sentencing Mr Garrett to six months in jail, suspended for two years, Judge David Goodin said he understood the trucker had been put in a "very difficult position" by the ongoing chaos at Calais. 

He said: "The court does accept international drivers coming from northern France through the Channel ports have a particularly difficult time of it presently because of the determined attentions of illicit immigrants who want to hitch on unobserved and get themselves to England at very nearly all costs. 

"One understands the more desperate they are the more alarming it is for a lorry driver who might find in the course of an inspection that he has such unwanted guests on his wagon. 

"Nevertheless the law cannot accept any attempt of vigilantism whatever the temptation may be for lorry drivers to arm themselves for the purpose of repelling these illegals." 

Wikipedia:
Persons alleged to be escaping the law or above the law are sometimes the victims of vigilantism. Vigilante behavior involves various degrees of violence. Vigilantes may assault targets verbally, physically, vandalize property, or even kill individuals.

UK Cops: "Arrest Him"; U.S. Cops: "Kill Him"

Man with Machete lunging at UK cops, they show restraint. This would never happen in the U.S. In the U.S., the preferred method would be to shoot and kill the man.

Video

Israel/Palestine, Both Sides of the Story

Article

Becoming a Cop is Like Becoming a Murderer

Cops do their jobs. If they don't they will lose their job. Cops detain, arrest and cage peaceful people simply because they possess a substance their political masters have arbitrarily deemed "illegal."

Getting arrested puts a permanent record on a person's life. Expungement does not delete photos and names on mugshot websites in the Ukraine or Pakistan.

The difference between a cop and a murderer is only in degree, not form.